Skip to main content

1993’s Doom Requires A Bethesda Account To Play On Switch, Quickly Becomes An Internet Joke

Illustration for article titled 1993’s Doom Requires A Bethesda Account To Play On Switch, Quickly Becomes An Internet JokeScreenshot: Kotaku (Doom)

Today, Bethesda announced the first three Doom games were all be coming to modern consoles including the Nintendo Switch. What Bethesda didn’t mention was that you’d first need to create a Bethesda.net account in order to play them.

ResetEra’s Nibel pointed out the requirement on Twitter earlier this afternoon. While Doom I and II only require you to login to a Bethesda account once to unlock the game, Doom III will require it every time you play in order for all of the features and content to be available.

It’s an especially bizarre requirement since none of the games have an online component. Each game only offers local multiplayer and doesn’t require an internet connection to play beyond the logins. I bought the original Doom earlier today because of the nostalgia of seeing the shooter I’d first encountered on the SNES decades ago playable in my hand on Nintendo’s newest console, but getting stuck at a login screen before I’d even fired my first bullet snapped my rose-colored glasses in half.

Is Bethesda really that desperate to get people signed up for Bethesda marketing emails?

Advertisement

In response to the requirement people have been poking fun at Bethesda and imagining what it would be like if the login prompts appeared in other classic games:

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled 1993’s Doom Requires A Bethesda Account To Play On Switch, Quickly Becomes An Internet JokeScreenshot: Shadow Hog (Twitter)

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled 1993’s Doom Requires A Bethesda Account To Play On Switch, Quickly Becomes An Internet JokeScreenshot: Steph Tru (Twitter)Illustration for article titled 1993’s Doom Requires A Bethesda Account To Play On Switch, Quickly Becomes An Internet JokeScreenshot: Professor Whom (Twitter)

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled 1993’s Doom Requires A Bethesda Account To Play On Switch, Quickly Becomes An Internet JokeScreenshot: Tonch (Twitter)Illustration for article titled 1993’s Doom Requires A Bethesda Account To Play On Switch, Quickly Becomes An Internet JokeScreenshot: TMOG (Twitter)

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled 1993’s Doom Requires A Bethesda Account To Play On Switch, Quickly Becomes An Internet JokeScreenshot: Monkey D Lenny (Twitter)Illustration for article titled 1993’s Doom Requires A Bethesda Account To Play On Switch, Quickly Becomes An Internet JokeScreenshot: Wii (Twitter)

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled 1993’s Doom Requires A Bethesda Account To Play On Switch, Quickly Becomes An Internet JokeScreenshot: The Herthium (Twitter)

Advertisement

Bethesda did not respond to a request for comment about why the login requirements were added to the new versions of the decades old games.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lisboa Board Game Review

Designed by: Vital Lacerda Published by: Eagle Gryphon Games Players: 1-4 Playtime: 60-120 Minutes Review copy supplied free of charge by Asmodee UK Jesus Christ, I have absolutely no idea where to even start with Lisboa, the latest table-hogging, mind-destroying eurogame from the highly respected Vital Lacerda. I’ve reviewed one game from Vital previously and utterly adored its lavish production values and stellar gameplay, but damn was it hard to review simply due to the way every mechanic tied to everything else. To explain one thing meant having to digress into about a billion other things before stumbling back to the original topic like a drunk emerging from a pub lock-in. It was confusing. Lisboa is just as complex and tricky to discuss, so please forgive me as I muddle through talking about Lacerda’s latest attempt to turn my already worryingly overheating brain into a melting pot of pink goo. The entire game is based around Lisbon, which is actually Lacerda’s hometown an...

Seriously Lazy Colonists

Platforms: PS4, Xbox One, PC Reviewed On: PC Developer: Mothership Entertainment Publisher: Team17 Singleplayer: Yes Multiplayer: No Review code provided free of charge by the publisher. My love of sci-fi mingles with my enjoyment of ruining people’s lives through ineffectual planning and general stupidity in Aven Colony, which takes the joys of constructing a city and then throws a thin science fiction theme at it in the vague hopes it’ll stick. Coming from a small team of just five people I wanted to be very clear about my feelings before we even jump in; it’s a good game, and such a small team should be damn proud to have built it from the ground up. They’ve got a bloody good future ahead of them. At its core Aven is a very safe city-building/management game where you’ll be juggling your people’s desires for a short commute to work with having enough farms to feed them all, power to keep everything running, a constant water supply and even policing to ensure crime is kept t...

Lobotomy Board Game Review

Designed by: Sebastian Kozak, Michal Kozak, Michal Marciniak, Maciej Owsianny Published by: Titan Forge Games Players: 1-5 Playtime: 60-180 minutes Review copy supplied free of charge by Esdevium Games. Lobotomy is not a small game by any means, dominating the table its placed upon after its lengthy and somewhat tiring setup process. Nor is it an easy game to enjoy at times. It’s fiddly with a myriad of individually simple rules that as a whole can be difficult to remember and constantly send you flicking through the poorly laid out rulebook. It would be easy to dismiss Lobotomy right there, but I’ve enjoyed fiddly games before. In fact one of the earliest board game reviews I did was on Arkham Horror, an intricate mess of mechanics, rules and dice rolling that takes ages to setup and that loves to make you reach for the rulebook. So I persevered. Was it worth it? Kind of. Lobotomy, as its name would suggest, takes place entirely in an asylum for the insane, and as the players y...